General

Profile

Tom Hsiung

  • Registered on: 09.02.2019
  • Last connection: 26.10.2020

Issues

Activity

26.10.2020

15:49 strongSwan Issue #3610: farp plugin conflicts with DHCP service
Thank you for your respond, Tobias.
According to your description. It seems that issue was caused by the fact that...

25.10.2020

05:41 strongSwan Issue #3610 (Feedback): farp plugin conflicts with DHCP service
Hi,
Looking on the surface, the cause of this conflict is the farp plugin. OK. Both StrongSwan and ISC-DHCP were d...

23.10.2020

11:19 strongSwan Issue #3609 (Feedback): Potential DNS server IP address conflicts
I have configure the DNS server address in strongswan.conf file by...
10:57 strongSwan Issue #3608 (Closed): To assign IP addresses in a different subnet ranges distinct so road warrior clients have virtual IPs not in a same subnet compared with physically direct-connected clients
Plan to use dhcp plugin to manage the IP address roadwarrior client could retrieve. However, I want the virtual IP ad...

25.06.2020

16:07 strongSwan Issue #3494: How to create self CA and public key in encryption algorithms of ECDSA 521
Just forgot to change the RSA to ECDSA.
Not it works.
However, I want to switch site2site certificates from RSA...
15:03 strongSwan Issue #3494: How to create self CA and public key in encryption algorithms of ECDSA 521
OK.
Now it says,...
13:16 strongSwan Issue #3494 (Closed): How to create self CA and public key in encryption algorithms of ECDSA 521
I created ECDSA private via:...

20.06.2020

13:56 strongSwan Issue #3487 (Closed): pkcs12 failed - No certificate matches private key
Hello,
Last week I tried to set up a new strongswan server on my Google Cloud VMs. But during the public key set u...

26.05.2020

18:32 strongSwan Issue #3464 (Closed): Is it safe to upgrade from Ubuntu 18.04 TLS to 20.04 TLS
Hello,
I just learned that Ubuntu 20.04 TLS had been released. However, some strongswan plugins has been removed f...

15.03.2020

15:02 strongSwan Issue #3369: Possible to set size limit for UDP packet because of double encapsulation
Thanks. But I intend to use two-layer encapsulation, just for fun. Yep, I fixed the issue for TCP packets, quite easy...

Also available in: Atom