General

Profile

Jiri Zendulka

Issues

Activity

11.11.2020

09:55 strongSwan Bug #3627: swanctl - segmentation fault during loading encrypted private key
I see. The empty line was removed during importing encrypted key to our device. So there is a bug on our side too.
Y...

10.11.2020

17:12 strongSwan Bug #3627 (Closed): swanctl - segmentation fault during loading encrypted private key
There is "segmentation fault" error during swanctl --load-all (--load-credential) if encrypted private key is used. I...

25.09.2020

14:04 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode
I did some progress and transport mode is established and installed on both side but ping 192.168.7.232 <--> 192.168....

15.09.2020

13:47 strongSwan Issue #3563: Route-based VPN - remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
You can close the issue.
13:37 strongSwan Issue #3563: Route-based VPN - remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
I added route to the remote side address and then it is possible to change default gw to ipsec3....
12:43 strongSwan Issue #3563: Route-based VPN - remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
So it is not possible to use remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 in route-based IPsec? It works in policy-based IPsec. In that ...
12:29 strongSwan Issue #3563: Route-based VPN - remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
It cannot be added route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 to ipsecX......
12:09 strongSwan Issue #3563 (Closed): Route-based VPN - remote TS 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
There is a mention in documantation about route-based ipsec that it is possible to use 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 as local/remot...

21.07.2020

11:30 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode
Could you guide me a little?
The rule table ID 219 is OK? Or should I use something like 1000X?
Should I add some...

17.07.2020

10:05 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode
Responder:...

Also available in: Atom