strongSwan

10.02.2021

16:25 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode

I'm glad to see that someone run into the same problem. Thanks for the comment. I suspected that the problem is in th...

09:05 strongSwan Issue #3649: IKEv2 in transport mode with Cisco

I posted the issue on CISCO community.
https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/ikev2-transport-mode-ts-unacceptable-e...

08:57 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode

At this moment I am not able to solve this issue. As I wrote BEET mode and TUNNEL mode works well in route-based IPse...

08:44 strongSwan Issue #3693: Policy-based vs. Route-based - Data throughput

Ok. You can close the issue. Thanks.

04.02.2021

15:30 strongSwan Issue #3693 (Closed): Policy-based vs. Route-based - Data throughput

I implemented route-based IPsec on embedded devices (armv7) and I noticed that route-based IPsec has lower data throu...

08.01.2021

14:10 strongSwan Issue #3496: Route-based VPN - transport mode

I have been successful with a ikev2/host-to-host configuration in tunnel and beet mode. The set_mark_out setting in t...

03.12.2020

09:24 strongSwan Issue #3649 (Closed): IKEv2 in transport mode with Cisco

I need an IKEv2 connection in transport mode between Strongswan and Cisco. Cisco is a responder and has a public IP. ...

01.12.2020

10:55 strongSwan Issue #3643: Strongswan and FRR NHRP

OK, you can close the issue...

30.11.2020

12:43 strongSwan Issue #3643 (Feedback): Strongswan and FRR NHRP

If strongswan with NHRP (FRR iproject) is used, then some patches are needed for proper operation.
For example VIC...

11.11.2020

09:55 strongSwan Bug #3627: swanctl - segmentation fault during loading encrypted private key

I see. The empty line was removed during importing encrypted key to our device. So there is a bug on our side too.
Y...