strongSwan

24.06.2019

14:41 strongSwan Bug #3095: updown plugin and PLUTO_INTERFACE selection

Tobias Brunner wrote:
> > Here are the contents of the table 220 (10.4.0.1 is the virtual IP assigned to the (Win10)...

23.06.2019

23:23 strongSwan Bug #3095: updown plugin and PLUTO_INTERFACE selection

Here are the contents of the table 220 (10.4.0.1 is the virtual IP assigned to the (Win10) client)...

21.06.2019

10:31 strongSwan Bug #3095: updown plugin and PLUTO_INTERFACE selection

Nothing special:...

20.06.2019

13:52 strongSwan Bug #3095: updown plugin and PLUTO_INTERFACE selection

Hi Tobias,
your change does not seem to work:...

09:28 strongSwan Bug #3095 (Closed): updown plugin and PLUTO_INTERFACE selection

Hi,
I have *_strongSwan_* running on a probably typical multihome configured system (with _lan_ and _wan_ interfac...

20.03.2019

12:27 strongSwan Issue #2987 (Closed): No outgoing traffic on Samsung S9

Hi,
I am using latest strongSwan Android client on Samsung S9 (running Android 9) phone. The connection is establi...

17.10.2018

11:11 strongSwan Bug #2801: Session to Smartcard does not reconnect

Hi Manon,
Some time ago I thought I had the same issue (it turned out I didn't). However, I've written a patch tha...

11.04.2018

10:14 strongSwan Bug #2608: Ensure fetched CRLs are signed by certificate issuer unless cRLIssuer is specified in the CDP

Yes, the CRL checking works now as it should.
Thanks.

03.04.2018

13:46 strongSwan Bug #2608: Ensure fetched CRLs are signed by certificate issuer unless cRLIssuer is specified in the CDP

Well, "issuer of fetched CRL '%Y' does not match CRL issuer" error wasn't triggered in our case. We solved our proble...

12:21 strongSwan Bug #2608 (Closed): Ensure fetched CRLs are signed by certificate issuer unless cRLIssuer is specified in the CDP

Hi,
We are using strongswan with certificate based authentication. Some of the certificates are issued by CA "A" a...