strongSwan

12.06.2020

14:55 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

TAHER BAHASHWAN wrote:
> If I disable NAT-T on Palo Alto it will work, but what is the justification for this behavi...

11.06.2020

16:52 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

If they actually are plain ESP, then that output is wrong, because 4500 is evidently the NAT-T port:...

16:36 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

Does it work between two Linux peers?

04:16 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

Thank you. Seems like it's not exactly what I thought it could be. Would you kindly provide the output of `ip -s xfrm...

03:27 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

Thank you for the output of `ip address` and `ipsec statusall`, I really need the output of `iptables-save` though, n...

10.06.2020

01:05 strongSwan Issue #3480: StrongSwan process Ping replies

Please provide us the output of `ip address`, `ipsec statusall` and `iptables-save`.

02.06.2020

02:19 strongSwan Wiki edit: Checkpoint (#2)

the same workaround for IKEv1 -> the same workaround as for IKEv1, link text to FAQ paragraph

02:19 strongSwan Wiki edit: Juniper (#2)

the same workaround for IKEv1 -> the same workaround as for IKEv1, link text to FAQ paragraph

02:17 strongSwan Wiki edit: Juniper (#1)

Interoperability with Juniper brand devices

21.05.2020

09:45 strongSwan Issue #3452 (Rejected): *** buffer overflow detected ***:

...